特林康是葡萄牙国脚，能踢左右边锋，技术细腻，盘带出色，有一定的内切射门能力，曾在阿莫林的体系下证明过自己，如果能加盟，对米兰的中前场实力会是直接的提升。
摘要：反过来，如果最大只有三倍，十次交易即使偶尔成功，也很难覆盖损失。
德国人去年在打出高光赛季后以3500万欧元固定转会费加500万欧元浮动的价格转投纽卡斯尔联。
1、yoboo手机版 收购当年，王伟修就把总经理位置交给了刘圣，自己退居幕后。
从基本面来看，天齐锂业业绩已进入集中兑现期。yoboo手机版而期货以碳酸锂2609为例，其在5月13日盘中创下20.65万元/吨高价后便持续震荡下行，到7月21日盘中最低价13.68万元/吨，区间跌幅近34%，即便最近两日反弹，累计跌幅依然在30%。
2、北京男篮追逐新外援，2米06大前锋基本加盟，CBA场均11+7！
哈兰德近期非常火爆，但足球还是整体11人的运动，这点英格兰更胜一筹。
3、封面来了！王祉怡：跨越山海 再向彼岸
但若将目光聚焦于绿茵场上的个人对决，你会发现一个更加残酷的事实：如果说西班牙是法国的天敌，那么年仅19岁的超新星拉明·亚马尔，就是“世一锋”基利安·姆巴佩真正的“终极天敌”。
4、牙膏界的「泡泡玛特」，要IPO了
当下，大量开发者和企业希望利用消费级GPU进行AI推理与微调，但面临两个核心瓶颈：一个是多卡并行效率受限：消费级GPU默认P2P通信被限制，多卡数据需经CPU中转，延迟高，数据传输路径被迫拉长。
5、哑巴选手找回唐僧教练后 莱巴金娜的“钻石”模式还在继续
不过中场相对薄弱，科内和拉比奥的组合攻守均衡但创造力不足，进攻组织更多依赖前场的奥利塞回撤。
霍芬海姆前锋菲斯尼克·阿斯拉尼正站在职业生涯的十字路口。
"AI的竞争，本质上是算力效率的竞争。
6、国际足联官方：将对世界杯决赛后两队冲突进行调查
那些电池、核心元器件等，在现场被拆得七零八落。
这笔转会原定于7月13日完成，但因美职联展开内部调查而推迟——洛杉矶银河指控迈阿密国际在与球员接洽时存在违规行为。
7、中国男篮4大锋线基本敲定！崔永熙搭档最强4号位，冠军前锋获重用
02 算力芯片，跑出第二增长曲线 7月16日晚，海光信息、摩尔线程两家GPU龙头企业发布上半年业绩预告，其中摩尔线程预计今年上半年营收16.5亿元至17.5亿元，同比增长135.12%至149.37%；海光信息预计今年上半年实现营收85亿元至93亿元，同比增长55.56%到70.20%，归母净利润17亿元至18.3亿元，同比增长41.50%至52.32%。
目前托莫里合同仅剩一年，今夏是俱乐部避免其自由离队的最后套现机会。
8、新加坡公开赛：国羽男单无缘八强，两对女双率先晋级半决赛
曼联正式敲定从阿斯顿维拉签下29岁的比利时中场核心蒂莱曼斯，俱乐部将直接激活其合同中4100万欧元的解约金条款。
这种经营模式正是德甲俱乐部能够在财政公平政策下保持竞争力的关键所在。
原本是一份有点难看的简历，突然成了一场尚未抵达伊萨卡的远航。
9、出场时间多少不重要，斯帅想用好杨瀚森，这个度是三原则
猪都能飞起来，飞起来过程中能不能活下来，还得靠团队能力和对客户需求的把控。
四是扶优限劣促进上市公司做优做强。
10、不止佛得角门神，这些球星世界杯总涨粉数超1亿
战术风格：高压逼抢vs低位防守 乌拉圭在名帅贝尔萨的调教下，主打全场高压逼抢战术。
相较于2025年8月的0.30至0.34元/Wh，半年内上涨超过25%。
1、西班牙捧杯拿走5000万，球员人均75万欧，48队奖金榜揭开足球真相
马丁内斯的球队进攻手段丰富，既能打阵地战，也能打快速反击，进攻多点开花，威胁点分散，让对手防不胜防。
2、中国压箱底武器曝光！百吉瓦微波一打，美国星链卫星一夜变废铁？
其中托莫里、洛夫图斯-奇克、莱奥等预计可回收约1.2亿-1.3亿欧元，再加上此前出售球员（如希门尼斯、波贝加等）的分期收入及附加条款，以及意甲电视权利诉讼案中米兰应得的约2000万欧元分成，预计红鸟财团今夏的净投入在1亿欧元左右。
3、零跑全新B01和B10上市，开启10万级800V时代
三个变量或决定下半年方向 金价的下一个方向，或取决于三个关键变量。中国电动汽车“双雄”攻韩！极氪携7X挑战高端市场比如，对赌、大股东连带担保、定期回购。
4、赛季之星评选温网冠亚军全部落选，纳达尔为阿卡同意网协主席斗嘴
相对于天齐锂业等动辄巨亏或暴增几十倍的盈利，已算平和。
5、大胆预测，一旦郭士强下课，男篮新主帅，99％在以下三人之间产生
另一场半决赛，阿根廷人展示了什么叫冠军的心。
6、阿森纳酝酿双线挖角：16岁水晶宫边锋+卡迪夫城队史最年轻中场
宁德时代587Ah电芯已在内蒙古2.4GWh独立储能项目中应用，亿纬锂能628Ah储能大电池量产提速。
然后，费兰出现了——左脚一击，西班牙第二颗星入账。
尽管北方华创和中微公司暂未发布上半年业绩预告，但从长川科技的爆发式增长中不难窥见：刻蚀、薄膜沉积、测试等半导体设备市场，正随着AI需求的旺盛而进入新一轮扩张周期。
7、字母哥邀詹姆斯联手冲冠
阿根廷在四分之一决赛中3比1力克瑞士，延续了近四场比赛场均打入三球的火热状态，本届赛事累计进球已达17个。
本赛季上半段，米兰一度呈现出遇强则强、遇弱更弱的状态，但从最近2个月的战绩来看，他们也不再“挑食”了，什么级别的对手都能输。
8、金球先生加盟？德媒：皇马管理层做出决定 将签下罗德里合同4年
不过，如果已经失去主力位置的阿劳霍最终离队，俱乐部或许会转向市场寻找替代人选。
但卫冕英超，从来都是一件极其困难的事。
在供应链上，“光进铜退”被视为重要变革，赛道整体进入增长爆发期。
等他们长开了，早已无人问津。
e&成功完成Vodafone股份出售，实现59.5亿美元现金收益
3胜3负警报！中国男篮名单动真格，4人召回4人出局周琦赵睿回归！
连续逼平世界杯冠军！53万小国搅乱H组出线形势，对阵梅西不是梦
城市对决，燃动篮场｜2026少年CBA・中国人寿全国挑战赛青岛赛区城市赛火热开赛
关联文章推荐
- 1 与此同时，关于重庆铜梁龙队长向余望的表现，也引发了部分球迷的调侃与质疑。
- 2 这场比赛葡萄牙需要解决的是破密集防守的问题，而克罗地亚则需要利用好反击和定位球的机会。
- 3 足坛压根没有所谓的“争霸”，因为两人的战术价值与对球队的影响力，早已不在一个维度。
- 4 " 据ESPN报道，切尔西预计恩佐在休假结束后将照常返回伦敦参加季前训练。
- 5 Kimi K3的走红，让市场再次校准了对月之暗面的预期。
- 6 红鸟和芬威的合作关系可以追溯到很多年前。
- 7 相较于前任主帅阿莱格里的3-5-2体系，阿莫林的3-4-2-1架构中的双前腰配置，更符合恩昆库在莱比锡时期的活动习惯，即在禁区前沿的肋部空间持球、内切并完成最后一传或射门。
- 8 随后，用这笔钱去外面“砸”项目，要求企业把总部或生产线搬过来。
- 9 而在这场失利的漩涡中心，除了凯恩自身的挣扎，英格兰主帅图赫尔的战术安排，更是成为了外界口诛笔伐的焦点。
- 10 这位中场球员坦言，马拉多纳的故事始终萦绕在这支阿根廷队心头，但放眼全队，只有梅西才有可能复刻那种魔力。
- 11 26岁的新西兰国脚与球队签下一份三年合同，另含一年续约选项，新赛季他将身披8号球衣。
- 12 被移出的大多是与出资人主业关系不清的消费和泛服务项目，而那些尚未形成收入、但在产业链位置明确的流体动力、特种阀门等早期硬科技项目，反而获得了紧急补入资格。
- 13 与此同时，这笔交易也为巴萨管理层提供了急需的财政纾解。
- 14 这一规定，彻底打破了过去全国数千个区县“造城式”设立基金招商的套路。
- 15 Nexfin News — China’s lithium battery industry is undergoing a rite of passage, transitioning from wild expansion to disciplined competition. In the first half of the year, a rare divergence between surging corporate earnings and falling stock prices brought a permanent shift in the sector’s underlying dynamics into sharp focus. By mid-July, A-share lithium battery stocks pulled back despite dramatic midyear earnings forecasts. Tianqi Lithium projected net profit growth of up to 4,935% year-over-year, EVE Energy forecast a 95% to 110% increase, and both Sunwoda and REPT BATTERO turned profitable again. Across the supply chain—from upstream lithium salts to downstream battery makers—most companies reported substantial operational gains. Yet robust earnings failed to stop equity valuations from sliding. On July 8, Chengxin Lithium hit its daily downside limit, Yahua Group dropped over 15%, and Tinci Materials saw more than 30 billion yuan in market value evaporate within a week. Ganfeng Lithium has fallen roughly 38% from its peak, while market leader CATL is down about 20%. The immediate trigger for the selloff was the resumption of operations at CATL’s Jianxiawo lithium mine. On June 29, the mine secured its safety production permit, which was officially posted on the Credit China website on July 7. The site—the world’s largest single lepidolite mine—had been idle for over ten months. With an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate, it previously accounted for 8% to 10% of China’s total output. Its return brings over 45,000 tons of additional supply in the second half of the year, hitting elevated lithium prices head-on. Futures markets reacted instantly: on June 18, as restart speculation grew, the main lithium carbonate contract fell 6.58% in a single session, beginning a steady slide from its May high of 205,000 yuan per ton. This stark contrast between thriving industrial output and falling stock prices coincided on the surface with lithium carbonate pulling back rapidly from its May peak of 200,000 yuan per ton to 151,000 yuan. But a more critical question remains: is this the sign of a cyclical peak, or is the industry undergoing a profound revaluation? Answering that requires stepping back to examine the paradigm shift that unfolded across the lithium battery sector between 2025 and 2026. The essence of this shift is not the fluctuation of any single price signal, but a permanent realignment of the industry's competitive playbook—moving from "who expands the fastest" to "who possesses technology, steady profits, and global compliance capabilities." From 60,000 to 200,000 In late June 2025, battery-grade lithium carbonate dropped below 60,000 yuan per ton, touching a three-year low of 59,900 yuan. Lithium salt producers across the sector incurred heavy losses, forcing widespread shutdowns among small and medium-sized manufacturers. From Australian hard-rock mines and small African projects to domestic lepidolite producers, virtually all marginal capacity went offline that summer. A two-and-a-half-year price slump accomplished its single necessary function: clearing out excess supply. By the fourth quarter of 2025, supply and demand dynamics reversed faster than the market had anticipated. The initial spark came from energy storage demand. Data from research firms including InfoLink show that global energy storage cell shipments reached roughly 610 GWh in 2025, up over 90% year-over-year, with fourth-quarter volumes alone topping 200 GWh. Production schedules showed energy storage cells clearing lithium carbonate inventories at an accelerating quarter-over-quarter pace. As growth in electric vehicle batteries moderated, energy storage stepped in not just to absorb excess capacity, but as the industry's primary growth engine. Surging demand was only half the story; supply contracted just as sharply. Small African mines and high-cost domestic lepidolite operations exited the market. Meanwhile, Zimbabwe announced a temporary suspension of lithium concentrate exports in February—a country that accounted for 15.5% of China’s lithium concentrate imports in 2025. Although Australia remained the primary pillar of China's upstream raw material supply at over 50%, the policy further tightened market expectations surrounding upstream supply. Zimbabwe's Ministry of Mines later confirmed that a formal export ban would take effect in January 2027. The tension between supply and demand peaked with the onset of a structural global deficit. Morgan Stanley estimated in early 2026 that the global market would face a shortfall of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) for the year. Soochow Securities calculated total annual lithium mine supply at approximately 2.14 million tons, representing 440,000 tons of new capacity—most of which was not slated to come online until after the third quarter. That timing gap fueled the price rally during the first half of the year. Driven by these converging forces and inventory restocking across midstream channels, lithium carbonate surged from 70,000 yuan per ton in October 2025 to 200,000 yuan by May 2026. Unlike the speculative frenzy that drove prices to 600,000 yuan in 2022, this recovery occurred after capacity had been fully built out, anchored firmly by real end-user demand. Gaogong Industry Research Institute (GGII) summarized the shift: "This is not a bubble, but a return to fundamental value. The structural surge in energy storage demand, combined with supply-side consolidation, has redefined a rational price band for lithium." Prices doubled quickly due to market sentiment and downstream stockpiling. July’s price correction reflected two main factors: the gradual release of new supply and downstream resistance to inflated raw material costs. Analysts generally expect lithium carbonate to trade within a median range of 120,000 to 160,000 yuan per ton for the full year—a price level that keeps most producers profitable without triggering another round of reckless expansion. Energy Storage as the New Engine In the first half of 2026, China's energy storage battery shipments reached roughly 485 GWh, a year-over-year increase of over 80%. Over the same period, power battery shipments totaled roughly 630 GWh, up over 30%. The gap between the two segments is narrowing rapidly. Structural figures are even more telling. In the first quarter of 2026, Chinese energy storage battery shipments totaled about 209 GWh, up 115% year-over-year and accounting for roughly 40% of total lithium battery shipments. By June, energy storage cells made up nearly 41% of monthly production schedules—up from around 30% a year earlier. According to InfoLink, full-year energy storage cell shipments in 2025 reached roughly 610 GWh, approaching 70% of power battery shipments over the same timeframe. Energy storage is no longer a side business for battery makers; it has emerged as an independent market reshaping demand across the industry. Behind this market realignment lies a fundamental shift in purchasing drivers. Before 2024, domestic energy storage growth was driven primarily by mandatory integration policies, which required wind and solar projects to install storage capacity. That regulatory setup created low-quality demand, leading to poor utilization, weak financial returns, and inconsistent cell quality. Between 2025 and 2026, market dynamics pivoted from regulatory compliance to commercial economics. The shift first materialized in the domestic market. In early 2026, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration jointly issued new capacity pricing regulations (NDRC Pricing [2026] No. 114), establishing a national capacity tariff mechanism for standalone energy storage facilities. Local standards were set between 165 and 330 yuan per kilowatt-year, depending on the province. Surveys by Soochow Securities indicated that internal rates of return (IRR) for storage stations in several provinces crossed the 6% threshold required for commercial viability, especially where peak-to-valley price spreads exceeded 0.3 yuan per kWh. IRRs for top-tier projects reached as high as 10%, fundamentally improving overall demand quality. This domestic turning point coincided with an explosion in international demand. Major solar-plus-storage projects launched across the Middle East, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with individual project capacities regularly reaching several gigawatt-hours. In emerging markets across Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa, weak power grids and rising renewable energy penetration transformed energy storage from an optional luxury into a necessity. Soochow Securities calculated that utility-scale storage installations in emerging markets grew 233% year-over-year in 2025, with an additional 69% increase projected for 2026. In Europe, energy security concerns and green energy quotas kept commercial, industrial, and residential demand robust. GGII projects that global energy storage battery shipments in 2026 will reach 800 to 1,100 GWh, representing year-over-year growth of 30% to 70%. Even at the mid-point estimate of 900 GWh, energy storage output is positioned to approach or match power battery production this year. As the industry's primary growth engine shifts, its core operational requirements are evolving as well. Power battery demand is dominated by automakers, whose priority is cost efficiency. The customer base for energy storage, however, is far more diverse: utility operators prioritize long cycle life and safety, data center owners require high discharge rates and extreme reliability, and overseas projects demand lifecycle compliance and supply-chain traceability. Winning in these markets requires technological adaptation, solid project execution, and international compliance capabilities rather than sheer scale. Oversupply or Industry Maturity? Evaluating battery utilization rates requires a closer look at the underlying numbers. In May 2026, the single-month installation rate for Chinese power batteries dropped to roughly 38%. Over the first five months of the year, cumulative power battery installations totaled 259 GWh against 863 GWh produced—yielding an overall utilization rate of about 30%. Factory output continues to outpace vehicle installations, leaving a substantial share of manufacturing lines underutilized. The five-year trajectory of Chinese power battery installation rates tells a clear story: 70% in 2021, 54% in 2022, roughly 52% in 2023, 50% in 2024, 44% in 2025, and 38% by May 2026. This steady decline in installation rates offers clear evidence of an industry transitioning from rapid early growth into maturity. Yet labeling the sector simply as oversupplied misses crucial nuances. The market is not experiencing a uniform glut; rather, it is undergoing sharp structural polarization. High-end shortages coexist alongside low-end surpluses. Demand for premium batteries with energy densities above 160 Wh/kg—primarily ternary chemistries—rebounded sharply, rising from a 6% market share in 2025 to 11%. Meanwhile, low-end products under 125 Wh/kg have effectively been phased out. Demand has also diverged sharply between commercial and passenger vehicles. Driven by subsidy policies, battery demand for electric heavy trucks and delivery vans surged, with battery consumption for electric cargo vans rising 169% year-over-year. By contrast, electric buses—once the industry's primary market—fell to fifth place. While market leadership remains dynamic, the nature of competitive moats is shifting. CATL and BYD together retain a 68% market share, but second-tier players like Gotion High-tech, EVE Energy, Svolt Energy, and Hithium are making gains. Competition is shifting from pure capacity expansion to technological differentiation and operating margins. From another perspective, declining installation rates are a natural hallmark of industry maturity. As annual growth moderates, a drop in capacity utilization from 70% to 40% is to be expected. While systemic capacity pressures continue to weigh on industry-wide profitability, and smaller players face ongoing price competition, market leaders retain the balance sheet strength to navigate the transition. As top-line growth slows, manufacturers lacking proprietary technology, accumulated capital, or global compliance infrastructure risk being squeezed out. This shift explains recent strategic course corrections by major capital allocators. Anode producer Sinomatech canceled a 10.3 billion yuan expansion, cathode supplier Dynanonic abandoned a 10 billion yuan project, and separator manufacturer Semcorp terminated a roughly 2 billion yuan facility in Malaysia. Top-tier players reining in massive investments is a classic sign of an industry transitioning from early expansion to financial discipline. This reallocation of capital does not mean expansion has halted entirely. In the first half of 2026, manufacturers announced over 65 new planned projects representing more than 1,500 GWh of capacity and over 220 billion yuan in total investment. Hunan Yuneng disclosed a 24 billion yuan expansion, while Yahua Group announced additional capacity in Zimbabwe. Expansion continues, but the prerequisites have changed: only enterprises with strong technical barriers, cash reserves, and global compliance infrastructure are positioned to invest while competitors scale back. Technology Race 2.0: Three Fronts If the period between 2022 and 2024 was defined by a race for manufacturing scale, 2025 and 2026 have marked a pivot toward technological differentiation across three distinct fronts. Front One: Structural Shortages in 314Ah Cells The central operational focus for the energy storage supply chain in 2026 has been a structural shortage of 314Ah cells rather than short-term price swings in raw lithium. By March, average spot prices for 314Ah cells from tier-one manufacturers approached 0.40 yuan per Wh, with small-lot orders reaching 0.45 yuan per Wh—a surge of over 25% within six months compared to the 0.30 to 0.34 yuan per Wh seen in August 2025. The immediate driver was rising raw lithium costs—at 180,000 yuan per ton of lithium carbonate, theoretical cell production costs sit between 0.35 and 0.38 yuan per Wh. However, the root cause was a supply gap during the industry's transition to larger formats. As manufacturers shift from 280Ah and 314Ah form factors toward 500Ah+ designs, investment in legacy 314Ah production lines has largely ceased. Because next-generation 500Ah+ cell capacity will not scale up until late 2026, production ramps and customer testing created a temporary bottleneck. During this supply gap, the deficit widened significantly, pushing delivery timelines for select orders into 2027. This dynamic reflects a clear shift in industry economics: market returns are no longer guaranteed simply by bringing capacity online, but by executing format transitions ahead of competitors. CATL has already deployed its 587Ah cell in a 2.4 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia, while EVE Energy has accelerated mass production of its 628Ah format. With the shift toward larger cell formats underway, manufacturing execution is everything. While 314Ah supply constraints present an immediate operational challenge, solid-state technology represents the long-term competitive battlefield. Front Two: A Return to Realism in Solid-State Batteries Although 2026 has been touted as the inaugural year for commercial solid-state battery deployment, that label requires qualification: current production consists almost entirely of semi-solid (hybrid liquid-solid) chemistries. Models including the NIO ET9, MG4, GAC Hyper, and Chery vehicles have entered the market equipped with semi-solid packs featuring energy densities between 350 and 400 Wh/kg. Because these designs remain compatible with over 90% of existing liquid battery production lines, retooling costs remain manageable and rollout schedules are accelerating. However, the commercial reality of all-solid-state technology remains far more complex than vehicle showroom specifications suggest. In March 2026, Ouyang Minggao, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, offered a candid assessment: "To be prudent, it is best not to commercialize all-solid-state battery vehicles over the next two years." He cited three major technical hurdles: solid-solid interface stability, where microscopic gaps between solid electrolytes and electrodes cause internal resistance to spike; lithium dendrite formation and safety risks; and the environmental volatility of sulfide electrolytes, which decompose upon exposure to moisture and demand strict manufacturing conditions. Industry leaders report steady if measured progress. CATL’s sulfide-based solid-state cell has surpassed an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, with small-scale production anticipated in 2027. BYD’s 20 GWh facility in Chongqing is scheduled to begin semi-solid production in the third quarter of 2026, targeting pilot runs for all-solid-state cells in 2027. Gotion High-tech plans to initiate operations on a 2 GWh solid-state line by late 2026, while EVE Energy has produced sample 60Ah solid-state cells. A clear timeline has taken shape: 2026 is focused on pilot line verification, 2027 on vehicle testing, and 2030 on potential large-scale commercialization. The implementation of recommended national standard GB/T 43568-2026 (Solid-State Batteries for Electric Vehicles) on July 1, 2026, established an initial regulatory framework for long-term development. Ultimately, 2026 marks less the mass adoption of solid-state technology than a recalibration of market expectations. Meanwhile, an underappreciated demand driver is quietly gathering momentum. Front Three: AIDC Storage as AI Infrastructure In the first five months of 2026, global energy storage shipments for AI data centers (AIDC) reached 10 GWh, surpassing total volume for all of 2025. Industry research firms project that global AIDC storage demand will reach 300 to 400 GWh by 2030—more than twenty times its 2025 level. Capital deployment in the segment is ramping up. CATL invested roughly 4.1 billion yuan to acquire a strategic stake in Senter Power to secure positioning in high-voltage DC power distribution for data centers, while winning a bid for a 2 GW / 4 GWh storage project at a computing center in Guizhou. Fluence signed agreements covering a 12 GW pipeline of potential projects with two major U.S. cloud providers, LG secured eight data center storage contracts totaling 6 GWh—including projects for Oracle—and Panasonic announced 350 billion yen in battery investment aimed at tripling its data center storage revenue. The expansion of AIDC storage is driven by a widening gap between AI computing power demands and utility grid capacity. Power consumption per rack in modern AI facilities has jumped from 5–8 kW in traditional data centers to 40–100 kW, while grid connection approvals and capacity upgrades often take three to five years. Onsite battery systems serve both as backup power and as a bridge to accelerate facility commissioning. Energy storage is moving from an auxiliary fallback to an integrated structural component of data centers. Following NVIDIA’s October 2025 announcement of an 800V DC power architecture—designed to phase out diesel generators and legacy uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)—storage systems are being wired directly into primary distribution networks. This shift expands the market beyond traditional buyers like power utilities and renewable energy developers to encompass cloud providers and infrastructure operators, establishing a distinct category of demand. Globalization 2.0 While domestic market consolidation marks the industry’s initial transition to maturity, international expansion presents a secondary test. Tariff structures, raw material access, and regulatory standards are tightening concurrently across major export markets. Trade barriers represent the most immediate hurdle. The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles have been in effect for five years and are expanding to include plug-in hybrids. In the United States, the Inflation Reduction Act continues to raise domestic content requirements for power and energy storage batteries. Concurrently, China has reduced its export tax rebates for batteries from 9% to 6% as of April 2026, with complete elimination scheduled for January 2027. Rising trade costs are accelerating a shift from direct product exports to localized overseas manufacturing. At the same time, competition over raw materials is intensifying. The U.S.-led Minerals Security Partnership continues work to build key mineral supply chains outside China, while changing rules in jurisdictions like Zimbabwe highlight shifting export policies. Strategic positioning across raw material supply chains remains an ongoing operational priority. Regulatory compliance presents a quieter but more complex technical hurdle. The European Union’s Battery Passport regulations will become mandatory on February 18, 2027, requiring detailed disclosure of lifecycle carbon footprints, material origins, and recycled content percentages. The impact of these rules depends heavily on how accounting frameworks are defined; systematic discrepancies in baseline emissions databases regarding Chinese energy mixes or manufacturing processes could affect market access. In response, leading Chinese manufacturers are moving from passive compliance to active engagement with international standards. CATL has partnered with BMW and Germany’s Catena-X network to help establish over 90 baseline carbon accounting metrics. BYD invested over 100 million yuan to develop its "i-Carbon Chain" platform for digital carbon tracking across its supply chain. Similarly, REPT BATTERO collaborated with TÜV Rheinland and Circulor on a battery passport initiative, securing third-party verification for 98 independent datasets from an EU Notified Body. Overseas manufacturing footprints are expanding in tandem: CATL’s production complex in Hungary, BYD’s plant in Brazil, Gotion High-tech’s joint venture in the United States, and Envision AESC’s gigafactory in Spain. Chinese battery makers are transitioning from a model of centralized domestic production for export toward localized manufacturing aligned with international standards. This next phase of international expansion hinges on regulatory transparency, supply chain control, and deep local integration. Beyond Maturity In July 2026, as equity valuations diverged from corporate earnings across the lithium sector, market participants wrestled with where the industry stands in its broader evolution. The most visible change is the shift in growth drivers. With energy storage shipments reaching 485 GWh in the first half of the year to account for over 40% of total output, the gap between storage and mobility applications is closing rapidly. This demand-side pivot coincides with capacity rebalancing on the supply side, where power battery installation rates have adjusted from 70% down to the 30%–40% range, signaling an end to early, unbridled expansion while overall margins remain under pressure. These structural shifts are redefining entry barriers across the market. With 314Ah cell prices rising over 25% in six months and AIDC storage demand expanding rapidly, technical capabilities are increasingly determining market positioning. As national standards for solid-state technology take effect and EU Battery Passport deadlines approach, regulatory compliance has become a baseline operational requirement. The trajectory of lithium carbonate—falling to 60,000 yuan, rebounding to 200,000, and settling near 150,000—reflects a market seeking equilibrium. This broader transition was highlighted by a joint policy announcement on July 18, when three Chinese government ministries introduced a new consumption tax structure for batteries. Effective September 1, lithium-ion batteries are subject to a 2% consumption tax, rising to 4% in September 2027, while sodium-ion and solid-state batteries remain exempt through the end of 2028. The policy ends a tax exemption for lithium batteries that spanned more than a decade. Phasing in taxation uses fiscal policy to encourage capacity optimization and technological upgrading by taxing established chemistries while incentivizing next-generation alternatives. For second-tier cell makers operating on narrow margins, the 2% tax burden—equivalent to roughly 0.007 to 0.008 yuan per Wh—will further compress operating margins, reinforcing market consolidation around capitalized leaders. For China's lithium battery industry, 2026 represents a clear inflection point. Enterprises equipped with proprietary technology, international compliance frameworks, and established brand equity face a broader global landscape as the sector matures. Conversely, manufacturers reliant on single customers, lacking technical moats, or unable to meet evolving compliance standards face mounting pressure. The early expansion phase of the lithium battery industry has drawn to a close. Its mature chapter is just beginning. (This article was first published on the TMTPost App. Author | AGI-Signal, Editor | Zhao Hongyu)梅西走下世界杯赛场，变身硅谷投资人。
- 16 哈兰德近期非常火爆，但足球还是整体11人的运动，这点英格兰更胜一筹。
- 17 本届世界杯，镰田大地3场比赛打入2球状态正佳。
- 18 第三个名字是伊布近期私下向卡尔迪纳莱推荐的阿拉伊贝戈维奇，勒沃库森今夏刚以800万欧元从奥地利维也纳快速回购这名18岁的边锋。
- 19 千台订单确实是里程碑，但需要注意的是"三年千台"，平均下来每年三百多台，而且是规划目标，不是已交付。
最新评论
用户评论15547
请先登录后再发表评论
发布
相关推荐
1198亿美元的整体营收超出市场预期的1170亿，并且连续12个季度保持两位数增速，净利润同比增长近三倍，从去年同期的282亿美元，增长至1121亿美元。
广东队上赛季投资额第二，超过上海队，难怪朱芳雨对成绩不满
69932
她直言不讳：“一家初创公司，只要能挖出一个优必选核心高管，估值就能涨将近四成。[2026]
各位驾驶员注意！驾驶新规，6月1日起执行
77152
事实上，已归队球员在过去两周便严格执行了俱乐部制定的个性化健身计划，以确保在训练强度提升前保持良好的身体状态。
用小字变相误导？全球最赚钱的两家减肥药企对簿公堂
25196
而最让人触动的是他对自己内心世界的剖白——他承认自己变得对进球过度执念。
技术｜专家把脉：双打意识要与双打配合同步
24317
业绩随锂价大起大落，最直接的影响就是公司现金流极不稳定。
国防部行动迅速，11国齐聚昆明，菲律宾也来了，中方用双语算账
92543
特朗普认为这远远不够，要求西班牙将比例提升至5%，并开放军事基地供美军在中东行动。
慎入！巴西联赛惊现断腿惨案 胫骨被铲断鲜血直流 网友：杀人啦
84377
此时最容易出现大幅盈利，也最容易把已经兑现的收益错认成仍然存在凸性。
新疆男篮9战8负！管理层做出重大调整，洋帅正式离职，新帅3选1
69242
" 周日的决赛中，尽管拥有历史最佳球员梅西，阿根廷却未能对组织严密、更具攻击性的西班牙制造实质性威胁。
对谈 Video Rebirth 刘威：这个世界为什么还需要一个新的视频模型
89484
" 姆巴佩直指问题的核心在中场。
C罗继续前行，魔笛告别，这是一场为了告别的聚会
67607
这场围绕奥利塞的未来博弈，将在世界杯落幕后正式进入关键阶段。
480万冠军奖金只剩210万！温网最残酷真相：夺冠暴富只是假象
12946
+60276
+61930
+15412
